How to remove your personal information from data brokers
Your name, address, relatives and estimated income are already for sale on people-search sites you have never heard of. Here is how to find what is exposed, remove it from the brokers that matter most, and reduce how quickly it comes back.
The short answer
- Start here: search your own name on people-search sites first - they are the ones publishing your address and relatives to anyone who looks, and the highest-priority removals.
- Each broker has its own opt-out form, and some require identity verification. California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) is the most developed single mechanism so far.
- Removal is partial and temporary - profiles regenerate as new data flows in, so the realistic goal is reducing what is trivially available, not disappearing.
- Broker data is what makes a targeted scam message accurate enough to believe, so opting out is a security action, not only a privacy one.
- A data broker has no relationship with you at all - it assembles your profile from public records, purchases, app data and other brokers, then sells access.
Search your own name on a couple of major people-search sites to see what is already exposed, then work through each one's opt-out form — most are a request form on the broker's own site, and the people-search sites (the ones showing your address and relatives to anyone who looks) are the highest priority. If you are in California, the state's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) can request deletion across registered brokers in one pass. Expect it to be partial and to need repeating: profiles rebuild as new data arrives, so this is maintenance, not a one-time fix.
You have a relationship with the companies you signed up to. You have no relationship at all with the ones holding the most detailed profiles of you.
A data broker collects information about people it has never dealt with, assembles it into a profile, and sells access to buyers you will never interact with. Nothing about this requires your participation, and in most cases nothing about it is unlawful — which is exactly why the aggregate is so large.
Where the data comes from
Public records
Property transactions, voter registration, court filings, business registrations, professional licences, electoral roll data. Individually public and unremarkable; collectively a detailed history.
Purchase and loyalty data
Loyalty schemes are a data collection mechanism with a discount attached. That is not a criticism — it is the business model, and it is disclosed in terms nobody reads.
App SDKs
Free apps frequently embed third-party code that reports location, device identifiers and usage. The app's developer is paid; the data leaves through a channel unrelated to the app's function.
Warranties and surveys
Registration cards and competition entries asking about household income and interests exist for this purpose.
Other brokers
Profiles are enriched by merging with purchases from other brokers, which is how a profile grows more detailed than any single source.
What a profile contains
The details vary by broker, but a typical consumer profile includes:
- Name, current and previous addresses, phone numbers, email addresses
- Age, date of birth, household composition, relatives and associates
- Estimated income, property value, homeowner or renter status
- Vehicle records
- Purchase categories and brand affinities
- Inferred interests, including health-related ones
- Life events — a recent move, a new child, a bereavement, a marriage
Why this is a security subject, not only a privacy one
This is the part usually missing from articles about data brokers.
Broker data is the raw material for a convincing scam. A spear phishing message naming your employer, your recent move and your neighbour is not the product of a sophisticated intrusion. It is the product of a purchase.
It also supplies:
- The details that make an impersonation call credible — your address, your card's last four digits, your recent activity
- The personal facts that answer security questions, which is one reason NIST now prohibits knowledge-based authentication
- The information used in SIM swap attempts against your mobile provider
- Targeting for scams aimed at people who have recently been bereaved, moved, or come into money
People-search sites
A specific subcategory worth prioritising: brokers that publish profiles openly, searchable by name, showing addresses, phone numbers, ages and relatives to anyone.
These are the highest-priority removals, because they require no purchase and no technical skill to exploit. Anyone with your name can retrieve your address and your family members in seconds.
Opting out
How it works
Each broker has its own process, usually a form, sometimes requiring identity verification — which is its own irritation, since you are submitting identification to a company you are asking to hold less about you.
Where to start
The people-search sites first, then the largest aggregators. Search your own name and see what appears; those results are your priority list.
Legal routes
Some jurisdictions do better. California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform provides a single mechanism to request deletion across registered brokers, which is the most developed approach so far. The GDPR gives EU and UK residents a right to erasure, exercisable per company.
Paid services
Several companies will submit opt-outs on your behalf, repeatedly. Whether that is worth paying for depends on how much your time is worth; the process is genuinely tedious, and repetition is what makes it work.
Reducing what flows in
Opt-outs address what already exists. These reduce the inflow:
- Decline loyalty schemes you do not genuinely benefit from
- Review app permissions — location and contacts in particular
- Use a separate email for shopping and registrations
- Skip optional fields, especially date of birth and income
- Do not enter competitions that ask about your household
- Limit what you publish — the FTC's first recommendation for avoiding social media scams is to restrict who can see your posts and contacts
The full version of that last point, including which details are worth guarding hardest and why, is in how to protect your personal information online. For the removal side — search results, people-search listings, old accounts and California's DROP platform — see how to remove your personal information from the internet.
See what is public about you
Our privacy walkthrough shows what a people-search result typically contains and how each field would be used in a targeted approach.
Try it freeFrequently asked questions
- How do I remove myself from data brokers?
- Each broker has its own opt-out process, usually a form on its site. Start with the people-search sites, which expose addresses and relatives publicly. Some jurisdictions offer a single deletion mechanism — California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform is the most developed. Removal is partial and needs repeating.
- Which data broker sites should I remove myself from first?
- People-search sites — the ones that publish a searchable profile with your address, phone number, age and relatives to anyone who types your name in. They need no purchase and no technical skill to exploit, which makes them the highest-priority removals before you work through the larger aggregators.
- Is it worth opting out if my profile just rebuilds?
- Yes, for the largest brokers and especially the people-search sites, because those are the ones exposing your address and relatives to anyone who searches your name. Removal reduces what is trivially available, which directly reduces the quality of pretexts that can be built against you.
- What is a data broker?
- A company that collects personal information about people it has no direct relationship with, combines it into profiles, and sells access to those profiles. You have not signed up with them, they have no service you use, and in most cases you have never heard of them.
- Where do data brokers get my information?
- Public records such as property, voter and court filings; purchase and loyalty scheme data; app SDKs embedded in free apps; warranty and survey submissions; social media; and purchases from other brokers. Most of it is collected lawfully, which is precisely why the aggregate is so large.
Sources
- New FTC Data Show People Have Lost Billions to Social Media Scams — Federal Trade Commission, 2026
- FTC Data Show People Reported Losing $3.5 Billion to Imposter Scams in 2025 — Federal Trade Commission, 2026
About the author
Cybersecurity & Digital Literacy
Subash Poudel builds SafeSurf IQ, a digital literacy platform that teaches people to recognise scams by putting them in front of real ones. He writes the online-safety reference material here, working from primary reporting — FBI IC3, the FTC, Verizon's DBIR, NCSC and Ofcom — rather than secondhand summaries.
- Founder and engineer, SafeSurf IQ
- Writes and reviews the platform's phishing, scam and privacy curriculum
- Works from primary incident and fraud reporting, cited on every article
Last reviewed . Figures are checked against the primary sources listed above at each review.
Read next
- Privacy
Online privacy: what is actually collected, and what you can change
Online privacy is not about having something to hide. It is about who holds a record of your behaviour, how precisely you can be identified without cookies, and which of those things you can practically change.
- Privacy
How online tracking actually works
Tracking is not one technique but four, layered — cookies, pixels, identity resolution and offline data. Understanding which is which explains why blocking cookies changed much less than it seemed to.
- Social Engineering
What is pretexting? How pretexting scams work
Pretexting is the invented scenario that makes a request seem reasonable. It is the part of a scam that happens before any message is sent, it is illegal in several forms, and it explains why the best attacks ask for nothing at first.